Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KLibido


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 19:03, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

KLibido

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This subject does not meet established guidelines for general notability, as there is no evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable third parties. AMFMUHFVHF90922 (talk) 08:55, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 July 26.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  10:27, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 27 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete — the development seems halted since 2006; a passing mention in fsf.com plus a press release are not sufficient to satisfy notability guidelines WP:GNG for multiple in-depth reliable sources. Toffanin (talk) 08:32, 27 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep — The program isn't dead yet. (Neither is usenet) This is just from source forge Soureceforge Stats Doesn't include the many repositories. Utefs (talk) 09:11, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Utefs, thanks for dropping by. Generally speaking, not being "dead yet" doesn't strike a strong case for notability.  Do you have any evidence of this subject receiving non-trivial coverage from reliable third party sources?  That's what we're looking for here, that's all that is needed to sustain a well-nourished Wikipedia article. AMFMUHFVHF90922 (talk) 04:13, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - I was able to find this which isn't a lot. The same text apepars in this book.  Thats' not enough coverage to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:08, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.