Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KONIKA MEANING


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 06:40, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

KONIKA MEANING

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Prod template removed. Adam9007 (talk) 01:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete This is an unreferenced and dubious dictionary definition. There is nothing worth saving in a brief stub which includes this absurd claim: "In ancient times the only language used worldwide was sanskrit." Cullen328  Let's discuss it  06:04, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:DICDEF with dubious unsourced claim. If not exclusively so, "Konika" is mostly associated in search with Konica, the company past of Konica Minolta (which I am proposing to create that redirect, in before whoever created a whole Wikia for this "KONICA MEANING" realizes that Konika is available).  野狼院ひさし  u/t/c 06:38, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – We do have articles about given names (like Mary), so I could see having one about this one. But the etymology looks like OR, and I couldn't find any secondary sources that looked more promising. No indication what else would be in the article. – Margin1522 (talk) 08:28, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 18 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete कङ्का (or IAST:kaṅkā, ITRANS:ka~NkA) does indeed mean "scent of a lotus" (source:Monier Williams), but that is just a small part of the article other than which everything is pure conjecture. We can include words if there's material beyond a dicdef for them, but in this case -- based on a search, it happens to be just another Sanskrit word, nothing more. As &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  09:11, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NAD. Maduwanwela (talk) 16:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.