Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KPCE-LP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  19:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

KPCE-LP

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

LPTV station doesn´t meet notability.  CentralTime 301  ( talk , contribs) 16:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CentralTime 301  ( talk , contribs) 16:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions.  CentralTime 301  ( talk , contribs) 16:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Does not meet GNC and WP:BROADCAST. No reliable independent source. —  Mathieudu68  talk 21:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BROADCAST and past history. Nominator is again warned about spurious nominations.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:22, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The nominator's statement doesn't give a valid reason for deletion. The rest of the votes mention WP:BROADCAST one way or the other, but do not indicate why or why not the criteria is met, except for one mention of "history" which I can't find in the broadcast criteria.
 * Keep per WP:BROADCAST.4meter4 (talk) 03:26, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - appears to meet WP:BROADCAST due to history. Onel 5969  TT me 09:59, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 17:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - Hi - in the first sentence of WP:BROADCAST, "Notability may be presumed for a radio and television broadcast station if it verifiably meets through reliable sources, one or more of a variety of factors, such as importance to and history in the station's market..." (emphasis mine). Hope that helps. Onel 5969  TT me 19:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks I think that clarifies where the question is.  To those who believe the topic is notable, how has it been important part of the area's broadcast history?  To those who argue against notability, why is it irrelevant to the broadcast history?  Per WP:BROADCAST, does the station produce any original content, or does it just repeat what is sent to it by satellite, from an organization with no other ties to the area?   78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 19:26, 15 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.