Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KPXC-TV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP. J I P | Talk 06:49, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

KPXC-TV
Delete- This article does no more than tell us the local call number of a local branch of the i televison station. Ljlego 23:17, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, licensed TV station. There is a guideline about nonnotable stations, but it seems to have been superseded by precedent to keep any duly licensed station. Haikupoet 02:56, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. If there isn't enough infomation, expand it. 23skidoo 04:00, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Is this even a legit TV network? Try the google test, does the station even have a web site that isn't an squatter/scraper site? Dbchip 06:20, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment i/PAX is sort of on the second tier of networks, the ones nobody pays attention to. But they are real, and legit. It is true that they haven't been particularly successful, but they do exist and have affiliates nationwide. Haikupoet 06:28, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per 23skidoo and Haikupoet. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Any full power TV station, and many low power stations, qualify as notable enough for an article on Wikipedia. Also, being a stub is not a great reason for AfD. I would encourage you to take any future concerns you have about TV station articles to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations before AfD'ing them. &mdash;A 09:10, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above, as television stations (even i affiliates) are notable. Besides, doesn't it say that stubs should be expanded and not AfD'd on the guide to deletion ?  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  23:21, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, that statement is on the deletion policy. -- WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  23:22, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry- I didn't do this. Someone else did.  I must've left a login on somewhere and someone went to Wikipedia and decided this for me.  Sorry again.  I agree, this should be Kept.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.