Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KPlayer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:43, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

KPlayer

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable software. No unique features. Unsourced. Makes no claim to notability and does not provide sources showing notability. Run of the mill open source players are not inherently notable. Notable subjects have active editors and wikilinks. This article has no major edits in more than a year, and few wikilinks except for templates. Miami33139 (talk) 00:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete This seems to be just one of very many media players. Unless some sort of reliable source can demonstrate notability it does not belong. Sam Barsoom 00:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Give me a list some of useful and unique features and I might vote to keep. SF007 (talk) 02:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Very well known software distributed with most KDE-based Linux distros. LotLE × talk  22:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Do any provided references show that it meets our notability criteria? A quick search of news.google.com in the archives show minor mentions repeatedly, but can any sources show that it has been the primary subject of multiple independent sources? Miami33139 (talk) 23:07, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Which distributions? Sam Barsoom 04:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.