Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KRC (Scientology)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. M er cury   05:22, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

KRC (Scientology)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article does not assert the notability of its topic. Written primarily with in-universe, Church of Scientology jargon. Only uses two primary sources (L. Ron Hubbard), and no secondary sources, and has been tagged as such since June 2007, with no improvements. See also Articles for deletion/ARC (Scientology). Cirt (talk) 00:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, as nom. Cirt (talk) 00:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC).
 * Keep as with ARC (Scientology). The topic seems relevant, and it will be hard to find sources outside of the Scientology mini-universe. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 14:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * If sources cannot be found outside of Hubbard's own writings and sufficient time has been given with the article tagged for sources to be provided, then the best place for this sort of information is a Church of Scientology website. Notability is not established here.  We would not write an entire article on the Bible just referencing the Bible itself.  We may quote from it, sure, or reference portions of it, but not the entire thing.  Lack of any other sources/mention = lack of notability in this case.  Cirt (talk) 14:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC).


 * Delete. While notability is asserted ("fundamental concept" of this group), there are no reliable sources or even any quick way to verify that this statement is objectively true.  Please, folks, if you want to rescue this one, get some cites ASAP. Bearian (talk) 19:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, for reasons stated in nom. --DizFreak talk Contributions 18:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.