Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KRU Records (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:55, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

KRU Records
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Previous nomination resulted in redirect to KRU; however, it ended up be recreated a number of months after it had be redirect. The label seems to have signed a number of other acts beyond the band KRU, but none have notability themselves, so as a non-notable label, I think deletion is more appropriate then a redirect now. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 09:09, 4 February 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:52, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:52, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete fails WP:CORP. no significant indepth coverage except first source of this search. LibStar (talk) 07:35, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete no claim of notability. Just another music label.  MLA (talk) 22:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.