Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KR Movies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:08, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

KR Movies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't appear to meet WP:CORP. I find no independent coverage beyond routine listings. The company isn't mentioned in any of the sources cited in the article. It's released just one film so far, with three associated award nominations but no wins. The Wikipedia article about the "upcoming" film was written by the same user who wrote this one. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:14, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Multiple searches at Books, News, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary and I thought of searching newspapers but chances are slim (and will probably find results for the one film instead) if this company has only released one film and another soon. It seems Jaspreet Kaur's article also has notability issues so I may see if that one needs to be nominated as well. SwisterTwister   talk  01:29, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:23, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, at this point did not have received any coverage separate from the only movie it released, and one mention of a future second movie. No prejudice against recreation if more coverage appears.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:24, 10 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.