Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KSI vs Swarmz and KSI vs Luis Alcaraz Pineda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:57, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

KSI vs Swarmz and KSI vs Luis Alcaraz Pineda

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. A quick before shows the article is riddled with unreliable sources, and primary sources. Google results showed up routine coverage from a few sports sites. If anyone can uncover some significant, and or in-depth coverage to satisfy GNG, I would be happy to withdraw.  ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 06:34, 18 September 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting. I'd like to see some participation from veteran editors on this AFD. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:41, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Boxing,  and England.  ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 06:34, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not seeing how this is remotely notable. There's fights all the time, and if we were to list every sporting match, we'd never finish. Mr.weedle (talk) 05:25, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I'd argue that two fights in the same night is not all that common, so I'd say it deserves to stay up. Plus, KSI's other, less notable fights are also on here, and the same can be said for many others. 20Hydrax04 (talk) 12:59, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * What other "less notable" fights would you be referring to? KSI's fights with Logan Paul received in-depth and significant coverage through prominent British newspapers and sports sites. This event does not seem to have any significant coverage.  ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 15:45, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep The event was a huge success, had a lot of promotion and coverage and was a massive success on DAZN being one of the most streamed events on the website, so it is more than notable and recognised. RedactedUser300 (talk) 18:19, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Sources please, or we can't keep it. Oaktree b (talk) 21:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep/Merge, the article seems to pass the general notability guidelines though some of the sources currently in the article seem to be unreliable or primary sources. Sahaib (talk) 20:10, 25 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Widely promoted is useful, but not an RS. We need to see news sources covering it. I'm not finding much of anything. This is about the best, it's mostly confirming who's fighting and when it happens. . Like half a GNG source. Oaktree b (talk) 21:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not seeing significant independent coverage in reliable sources. These fight cards seem to be a bunch of non-boxers making their debuts in search of publicity.  Fight announcements and reporting of results do not show WP notability.  If someone can show that WP:GNG is met please let me know, otherwise this just looks promotional to me.  I don't see how it meets WP:NEVENT since it doesn't have "enduring historical significance", "a significant lasting effect" (WP:LASTING), nor does it have "widespread impact" that is "widely covered in diverse sources". Papaursa (talk) 19:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Like Oaktree, not seeing nearly enough RS coverage, despite the tendency for these events to get overhyped, which would only make us be more stringent in our sourcing requirements. Ovinus (talk) 05:46, 27 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.