Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KSL Capital Partners


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  07:40, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

KSL Capital Partners

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of any significant notability. Refs are directory style listings and notices about acquisitions plus dead links - nothing about the company itself. Searches reveal little more of any substance. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 15:26, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   FITINDIA   15:37, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.   FITINDIA   15:37, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   FITINDIA   15:37, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  19:21, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Non-notable & promotional purposes. Light2021 (talk) 11:09, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 01:27, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: I am not seeing better than acquisition announcements, etc.: routine coverage which can help verify but do not provide the substantial coverage needed to demonstrate that the firm is of encyclopaedic notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 06:40, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing ++ 12:42, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. "It holds US$3.4 billion in assets.".Zigzig20s (talk) 21:35, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- no significant coverage that discusses the subject directly and in detail. Sources included in the article are directories or coverage of routine transactions, none of which are sufficient for notability. Holds $X in assets is not a criterion that's part of WP:NORG. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:14, 2 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.