Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KT Kumho Rent A Car


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Kumho Asiana Group. Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 11:55, 19 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I've reclosed the AFD as Merge as the closer above for some bizarre reason closed it as Redirect...., Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 15:21, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

KT Kumho Rent A Car

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A non-notable car rental company. The refs show that it exists and rents cars but no notability. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 22:07, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:56, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:56, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:44, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

*Delete as searches are not finding anything noticeably better. SwisterTwister  talk  06:06, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect perhaps at best as this certainly is not solidly independently notable but mentioning this there may be acceptable. SwisterTwister   talk  01:26, 18 April 2016‎ (UTC)
 * (I've amended the comment above as the editor had changed to Redirect but made their !vote all confusing, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 01:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC))


 * Merge into Kumho Asiana Group where it was a subsidary of that company before being purchased, No evidence of notability to warrant a seperate article. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Kumho Asiana Group. North America1000 02:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Kumho Asiana Group - searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:21, 18 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.