Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KVHC-LD (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

KVHC-LD
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Texas. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


 * And doesn't seem to be accurate since its ownership with Bridge Media Networks since it's still an affiliate of Paranormal TV and not NewsNet according to RabbitEars. OWaunTon (talk) 15:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Articles for deletion/KVHC-LD is now closed and this one can run. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  18:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Texas. Shellwood (talk) 15:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: We are already up to a second nomination here because the first nomination was malformed — specifially . It would probably be best for one of the nominations — probably the barely-linked first one — to be itself deleted via G6 before any other action is taken with the article. (I don't yet have any opinion or further comment, in part because of this.)  WC  Quidditch  ☎   ✎  19:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.