Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KVM College of Engineering and Information Technology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails WP:GNG. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain (talk) 18:46, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

KVM College of Engineering and Information Technology

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No independent sources are there which gives significant coverage to the subject. Fails GNG Kichu🐘 Need any help? 16:08, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 16:08, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 16:08, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 16:08, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 16:08, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: I am the creator of the article. According to WP:UNIN, In general, all colleges and universities are de facto notable and should be included on Wikipedia. This is a higher education college recognized by and affiliated to state university- Vis M (talk) 17:20, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , the current notability guidelines of educational institutions are listed at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and this subject fails GNG as per that. Regards. Kichu🐘 Need any help?</i> 04:07, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , That's for secondary schools. This is an accredited degree-granting college (tertiary educational institution), which is still kind of considered de facto notable I guess. Also, news article https://archive.ph/H5GCO is an independent source that gives significant coverage for the subject (the original link had expired) - Vis M (talk) 18:59, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , see WP:NSCHOOL. This is applicable for all types of educational institutions and the subject clearly fails it. And this source you provided is mainly giving coverage about all the educational institutions under KVM trust. Moreover this source is written like an advertisement. KVM College of Engineering and Information Technology is an ISO 9001 certified institution that strives to provide technical education of high standards to all sections of the society. The academic programmes offered by the college are recognized by the Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT). The institution has been approved by All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) and the Government of Kerala. Built on a 10.8 acre campus, the institution is located just two kilometers from the KSRTC bus station in Cherthala and five kilometers from the Railway Station and the National Highway. The KVM College of Engineering and Information Technology campus has been Wi-Fi enabled and includes excellent halls equipped with Audio-Visual aids. A well-equipped library in the college offers students with a wide range of latest books and journals. The hostel facilities offered by the college maintain impeccable standards. Among the other highlights of the college is the added importance that is rendered to developing the various skills of its students by its Personality Development Programme and the Soft-skill training. A well-coordinated placement cell ensures that the students are provided with good job opportunities after graduation. So this source from Hindu contains many peacock terms to promote this college, which simply means, it is just written for advertisement purpose (possible paid source) from my perspective. Regards Kichu🐘 <i style="color:green">Need any help?</i> 02:55, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BD2412  T 01:31, 16 April 2021 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:44, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete:as per non. clearly lacks significant coverage. defcon5 (talk) 15:31, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Ankit (Talk with me) 21:07, 2 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.