Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KWBG


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

KWBG

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Looks promotional, unsourced NW1223 ( Howl at me ·  My hunts ) 01:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Agreed sources are needed (even for a low-profile stub for a low-profile station, this is thin), but the station itself does meet WP:BCASTOUTCOMES.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 03:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Nate. Will take care of sources in a bit.  Got an appointment. -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 16:49, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Page updated with a slew of sources, 7 in total. Brings it well in line with NMEDIA. -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 00:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - Article has been expanded and is thoroughly sourced. Passes WP:GNG.--Tdl1060 (talk) 21:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep significantly improved since the nomination, passes WP:GNG. SportingFlyer  T · C  10:35, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. I see the problem at the time of nomination, but the article has been expanded with improved referencing. Bearcat (talk) 16:29, 25 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.