Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KZEY


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. While amusing, this isn't the place. Go fight on a talk page or something. BJ Talk 06:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

KZEY
I'm not finding significant coverage of this radio station in 3rd party sources. This article lacks substantial references and does not appear to be notable in any way whatsoever, therefore it should be deleted.Aliveatoms (talk) 02:54, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Speediest of Keeps - All radio stations are notable. Nominator's actions are the subject of a thread on ANI.  Requesting this be speedy kept and the nominator warned. -  NeutralHomer  •  Talk  • 04:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)


 * COMMENT I'm sorry, I have to strike your Speediest of Keeps unless you can back this up by established Wiki guidelines. Unfortunately, WP:ORG explicitly states that an organization is only "considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." An Arbitron listing would hardly be considered notable or significant independent coverage. If you can back your claims up with facts, your vote to Keep will be considered. I appreciate your comments on my Discussion page, but personal attacks are uncalled for. Let's please stick to the topic of whether this article merits inclusion. Aliveatoms (talk) 04:58, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Answer - First, strike any comment made by anyone and I will take you to ANI myself. Second, you and I both know that this is in retaliation for nominating Jim Braden for deletion.  That is blantant bad faith and in complete violation of WP:AGF and WP:POINT.  Third, please see this and this. -  NeutralHomer  •  Talk  • 05:03, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Reply Whether it has a strike through or not, i still will not consider your opinion unless you back it with established guidelines or fix the article. Sorry. Aliveatoms (talk) 05:08, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * You don't have to consider the opinion. You are, and will not be, the closing admin. Whether or not you "consider" Neutralhomer's opinion is completely irrelevant. Tan   &#124;   39  05:09, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * What Tan39 said and did you read the two links I included? -  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • 05:11, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I see your links, but I do not see how they help your argument. It states "notability can be established by either a large audience, established broadcast history, or unique programming." This article demonstrates none of those qualities (unless you feel "Adult Contemporary" is an especially unique form of music?). And I still don't feel Wikipedia is a place to just list radio stations. Aliveatoms (talk) 05:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * You didn't read the page you are nominating. It isn't an "Adult Contemporary" station, it is an "Urban Contemporary" station.  Second, Adult Contemporary is one of the most featured formats on radio probably second to Country, but that might be pushing it.  You probably have an AC station in your area, probably two...and I bet you they have articles here.


 * While you are reading, do look up WP:AGF, WP:POINT, WP:NPA, and WP:DICK, won't you? -  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • 05:31, 20 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Nice try... but maybe YOU aren't reading the article? I'm afraid we'll have to draw the line in the middle: it's Urban Adult Contemporary. Either way, you have offered NOTHING that supports your initial claim that "All radio stations are notable". Aliveatoms (talk) 05:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

(undent) ...and like I said, if you knew anything about radio stations, you would know that "Urban Contemporary" and "Urban Adult Contemporary" were the exact same thing. Also, if you had actually read the links I sent above, you would see that is the basis for the, oh, 10,000+ radio station and television station articles on Wikipedia. That notability has not only the backing of many, many, many, MANY users, but many, many admins as well, plus it is backed by the precedence of many AfDs. This will be just another. So, you are sorely outnumbered and woefully under-educated on the subject. -  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • 05:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * You should read these yourself: WP:AGF, WP:POINT, WP:NPA, WP:DICK, and don't forget to find some notable third-party reference material for radio station KZEY while you're at it. You have made numerous accusations here (I "didn't read the article", I don't know "anything about radio stations", etc.) Not to mention the multiple personal attacks you leveled on my discussion page and elsewhere. Have a nice night, and a nice life! Good bye! Aliveatoms (talk) 05:44, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * If you leave, does that mean you would like to withdrawn your AfD or have it closed as precedence? Either way, it will be closed as a Keep :) -  NeutralHomer  •  Talk  • 05:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.