Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K N George


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:06, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

K N George
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

not notable, not written in an encyclopediac tone VERSACESPACE 16:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 December 15.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 16:53, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet any of the inclusion criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep A WP:VAGUEWAVE and no evidence of WP:BEFORE. Content is irrelevant at AfD. Simple precursory viewing shows meeting WP:NPROF criteria 2 and 3 (awards and positions in international bodies, VP of the IASSW and President of the ASSWI). Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 03:21, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not seeing enough to pass NPROF/GNG. I don't see why "VP of the IASSW and President of the ASSWI" should be sufficient, those are minor bodies that nobody even bothered to stub here yet. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  11:41, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - not enough sourcing to meet WP:GNG, and as points out, without those two minor bodies, doesn't pass WP:NSCHOLAR.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment "minor bodies ... nobody has bothered to stub yet" ... International Association of Schools of Social Work (IASSW).--Goldsztajn (talk) 08:21, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Question Does the directorship of the Madras School of Social Work qualify for WP:NPROF C6? Am I correct that the relationship of the school with the University of Madras is similar to that of e.g. Berkeley with the U California system? Russ Woodroofe (talk) 14:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment The equivalent would be more like one of the autonomous colleges within the University of Oxford system; nevertheless, I would agree that he still qualifies for C6. Depending on the survey MSSW is ranked 3rd or 4th best social work school in India. --Goldsztajn (talk) 20:18, 19 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.