Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K Ningleithing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:58, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

K Ningleithing

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Partly per the issues raised in the article itself. Partly on notability. Regardless of whatever arbitrary nonsense we have on this area, it stands to reason that if we don't know a living person's first name, it is very unlikely that he is notable. —WFC— 08:44, 2 November 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:56, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 01:24, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - it is common for Indians to be known by just an initial; however, there is still no evidence this player meets WP:ATHLETE or WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 01:25, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but is his full name "K Ningleithing P Ningleithing Ningleithing" as shown by the reference ;-). The "P" stands for "Pungcham" although some references use "Phungchem" and he has scored in the Goa professional league which is fully professional according to RSSSF here, and possibly the played in the AFC Cup.-- Club Oranje T 11:52, 9 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - there is no indication he meets the relevant notability criteria. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:38, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.