Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaali Venkat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar ♔   18:32, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Kaali Venkat

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Repeatedly-recreated bio of an Indian actor, speedy-deleted three times in accordance with WP:CSD and should have probably been salted at that point. In any case, the current incarnation is significantly expanded over the deleted versions, but relies only on two sources, one of which is a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE (an interview). The subject does not seem to meet any of the criteria for inclusion in WP:ACTORBIO. ~Amatulić (talk) 13:08, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 16 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 07:52, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   04:45, 1 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, done enough notable work. His progress has been recognized and reported in the media . Editor 2050 (talk) 21:18, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, that "progress" is more or less the point. You don't get a Wikipedia article if you're up-and-coming. You must have already arrived. That's why we have this AFD proposal, to determine if he has, indeed, arrived in accordance with WP:ACTORBIO, or is he merely up-and-coming. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:27, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.