Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaatrai Konjum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 21:48, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Kaatrai Konjum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Delete: No source given. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:29, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP need not have articles on all movies. How do we know that this one will be notable, given that shooting itself did not start when this article was added? WP is not a place to announce future movies.--GDibyendu (talk) 13:14, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Imaginative film; probably a hoax. The creator's user page reveals that they are highly imaginative. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  04:31, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Imagination aside, that user's page is set up to appear as a WP:FAKEARTICLE... an issue that itself needs to be addressed.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:54, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 09:31, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 09:31, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Tamil language:)


 * Delete under WP:NOT YET (films) I'm not quite willing to call this a hoax, as there do appear to be Tamil language sources found when searching in that language.... but being unable to translate, I am unable to determine source content. This may well be an issue for WP:CSB. If someone can translate, I would be most appreciative.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:54, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Yes, it's a hoax. Schmidt, I believe you searched for "தில்லாலங்கடி", however that is not the transliteration of Kaatrai Konjum but of Thillalangadi. No, there is no such film in making. There are no sources anyway. Johannes003 (talk) 22:07, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. I'm glad to stick with a delete.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's unsourced and also looks like a hoax. Torreslfchero (talk) 13:35, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.