Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaavalkaaran


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Kaavalkaaran

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Was deleted a couple of weeks back -- Articles for deletion/Tamil Remake of Bodyguard. G4 was declined as the film seems to be moving along. However, other than the fact that the film now has a name, I believe all the statements from the earlier AfD apply. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  05:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  05:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  05:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - The behindwoods article indicates filming has started in 5 April (I read the same in Dina thanthi a week back). Here is an indiaglitz report on the opening song being filmed. And being a vijay film it won't lack for GNG in south Indian media, thus the production itself is notable. per WP:NFF it is enough to keep the article. --Sodabottle (talk) 06:21, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver  seren C 06:35, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silver  seren C 06:35, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I have added 7 references to the article that establish notability for the film. It seems that he's actually not that far from having it completed. Silver  seren C 06:35, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep References added seem to point to some major news sources.  D r e a m Focus  07:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment References are trivial, the lead actress fell ill after some gas leak while shooting and that's essentially what most of the coverage is about. However, if my interpretation of WP:NFF isn't correct and any film is notable because it's reported as being produced and Wikipedia is the equivalent of imdb for film articles, then I guess I'll withdraw the nomination.&mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:46, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Spiff, reports of film production are always like that one - some incident delays shoot, some cast member injured, some song filmed in some place etc. I guess in this particular industry these are not trivial. But since whole articles are dedicated to cover Asin's injury etc, we should assume notability (you should see the Tamil press, this incident had a half page spread in back pages of Dinakaran asking "Padapidippil Asinnukku udal nalakuraivu?" in 20 pt font :-) ).


 * Strong keep - filming has started and several websites state this. The film's lead actor himself has claimed the film has started rolling. This article is perfectly safe to be kept. Eelam StyleZ (talk) 01:13, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.