Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kabale Tache Arero


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to National Land Commission. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:47, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Kabale Tache Arero

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No in-depth coverage. No evidence of passing WP:NBIO. I am not seeing anything that's both in-depth and reliable. A merge has been suggested in an edit summary by editor who removed the PROD but with no specific article. We don't usually merge biographies into other pages, so I don't see a good target. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 14:02, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  14:02, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  14:02, 9 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Just read the article properly. That is an essential part of WP:BEFORE. The Banner  talk 15:09, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I did. Did you? I am not seeing you even voting keep here, which does say something about this being a lost cause. And you still have not clarified what that supposedly valid merge target would be. Do go on. So what's your contribution to this discussion outside of commenting about an editor instead of a said article? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I did. That is why I could identify a merge-option as alternative for plain destruction. The Banner  talk 08:54, 10 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect to National_Land_Commission where she gets a mention (and unlink her in that article). Pam  D  08:31, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the suggestion. If someone else had clearly specified this as a target, we wouldn't need to discuss things here. I am fine with your solution, and support speedy redirect and close for this nom. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:44, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * LOL, properly reading the article would have been enough to get the same idea but as always it has to be spoon-fed to you. The Banner  talk 13:06, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If you redirected it yourself... but where's the fun in being polite and constructive, eh? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Where is the fun in doing your work accurate and constructive? It is your dodgy PRODding that brings you into hot water. All those bad PRODs are very unpolite towards other editors. The Banner  talk</i> 10:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Clear keep this the head of a major government agency who is clearly notable... please,please stop with this trigger happy nonesess ot trying to delete everything. Piotrus's desire here is to not be constructive per the comments above. Sadads (talk) 11:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Please stop with your personal attacks. WP:ITSNOTABLE is not a valid keep argument, and ad hominens are even less. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * They aren't personal attacks when your declared intention is not being constructive and cooperate, and I am pointing out the pattern of failed logic that keeps emerging in these discussions, where on multiple occasions now you have not done due diligence on searching for Reliable Sources, even doing a pointed attempt at deleting a clearly notable article I started. Its reached a point of disruption, and attempts at wearing down members of the community who are not able to spend as much time as you are WikiLawyering, as you are, Sadads (talk) 16:17, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. By the progress of discussion here, this article should not have been prodded. It is one of many that were unnecessarily prodded, then AfDd. Let's all start using using merge to/merge or, in some cases, AfD but without Prodding. Prod is when no objections (but the creator) are to be expected. When deletion is a no-brainer. As off yet, I do not see one person but nom who proposes to delete. We undercover Kenya and the rest of Africa, we undercover women, and there are some sources in the article. When a a merge proposal will be submitted, I'll reconsider. gidonb (talk) 13:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - I located 4 Kenyan news articles that just named her. Here they are ,,,. I don't think she should have a dedicated page. Maybe redirect as suggested ealier? GizzyCatBella  🍁  03:54, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to National Land Commission. Unfortunately, I could not find any coverage in reliable secondary sources more extensive than a passing mention, and as such she does not pass GNG. In relation to the National Land Commission, the Chairman of that organisation does not have an article, and the members of the commission who do are notable for being elected to Kenya’s parliament, not for anything they have done with the commission. Therefore, I do not think that being the acting CEO of it confers automatic notability onto her. Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:16, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Keep Fmatovu has done a lot of great work for Africa and generally has a good idea of what to start. Could use some extra sources though,♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:04, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The fact that they did a lot of good job elsewhere is not very relevant. If any of my articles was deleted, I'd not think it should be kept with arguments that I did good job on many others. Anyway, would be nice if User:Fmatovu would comment here. The more input the better. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:35, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relist to allow more discussion and generate more obvious consensus
 * Redirect to National_Land_Commission where she gets a mention (and unlink her in that article). Has not established notability outside the NLC association. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 01:48, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, xinbenlv  Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:16, 21 March 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 19:27, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I think best to redirect to the National Land Council article, unless it can be shown she has done other notable work or is notable for some other reason. - Chris.sherlock (talk) 16:48, 4 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.