Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kacchwaha King of Amber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Kachwaha. (non-admin closure) -- Mdann 52   talk to me!  08:00, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Kacchwaha King of Amber

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article has a strong POV, no sources, and would require a complete rewrite to make it encyclopedic enough for inclusion. Ahecht ( TALK PAGE ) 14:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Redirect to Kachwaha for the time being, until an actual article can be written. The History of Jaipur currently starts with the founding of the city in 1727 by Maharaja Sawai Jai Singh II, a Kachwaha Rajput. The history section of the Jaipur State article starts with the Dhundhar state founded in 1093 by Dūlaha Rāya, a Kachwaha Rajput. But the Amer, India article pushes it back to around 1037 A.D. when Amber was conquered by the Kachwaha clan of Rajputs. All with a relative lack of citation. --Bejnar (talk) 04:43, 15 June 2014 (UTC) 
 * Keep (perhaps with REname or temporarily redirect). We have a mess here: Amber is piped to Amer, India.  That has a link to House of Kachwaha, which is itself a redirect to Kachwaha, which is an article on this Rajput caste.  Here we have an issue of spelling Kacchwaha or Kachwaha.  That article has a section on rulers of Jaipur State, which is subject to a merge request, becasue the first ruler apparently had a differnet capital or a different name for a state.  What we need is a list article for the rulers.  I would suggest that this should be Rajahs of Jaipur or Rulers of Jaipur, but this article might make a stub from which to start.  In UK, there is an article on every barony, and even baronetcy, though these were mere titles and conferred no sovereignty.  By analogy, there should be an article on the princely dynasty of each Indian princely state.  Some of the rulers will ne notable and have (or need) their own article; others will not.  Peterkingiron (talk) 08:43, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 08:17, 18 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.