Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kacey (porn star) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 03:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Kacey (porn star)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article survived an AfD once before, but there is no assertion of notability (that I can see immediately) in the article. Article consists of four sentences. - Philippe &#124; Talk 21:44, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete: The article had more content when it was first nominated (and when my vote was weak keep). --Yamla 21:53, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete: never provided any reliable sources, any evidence of verifiability via multiple independent sources, nor even much of a claim of notability per WP:BIO or WP:PORNBIO. Valrith 22:08, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. One credit does not meet WP:PORNBIO --Evb-wiki 22:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per nom. This article never seem to cite the sources when that page had more content and what has been cited shows no notability at all. Sawblade05 22:20, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete this article fails WP:PORNBIO per all above. Giggy  UCP 22:25, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 23:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Tabercil 23:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Cant find much because of the generic name to establish notability Corpx 02:41, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as she doesn't appear to be notable. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 05:07, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not at all notable. Abberley2 02:06, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Before being cut down, the article had quite a bit of unsourced, but sourcable content. 71.113.146.73 05:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * WP:N requires these sources Corpx 05:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.