Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kacey (porn star) (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Kacey (porn star)
The result was Speedy Delete as recreation of previously deleted AFD material with no significant improvement over issues addressed in said AFD. Chris lk02  Chris Kreider 16:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC) AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Was deleted before, but this is a new and substantial version, so I thought best to take to AfD again. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 08:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO. WilliamH (talk) 11:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:PORNBIO.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 12:18, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete although more substantial she still fails WP:BIO and WP:PORNBIO. Has no assertion of notability in the article (that I can see) and no reliable 3rd party sourcing to show notability. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:21, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. She's been in 33 movies--what's a girl gotta do to satisfy you guys?  And yes, she's been in some "iconic" films to satisfy WP:PORNBIO.  Well--just look at that list of titles.  It's not often you find a female porn star who's a size queen, so this may satisfy the "unique contributions" clause in WP:PORNBIO.  And there is certainly no shortage of WP:RS out there for her.  In fact, I wish all of the articles we looked at were this solid. Qworty (talk) 12:29, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: She may be a size queen but did she begin the trend, per WP:PORNBIO? Participating in it does not inherently translate into unique contributions. WilliamH (talk) 13:51, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD. Deleted by consensus at the 2nd AfD. Recreated without improvement. So tagged. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.