Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaci-badon, California


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep per WP:OUTCOMES (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Kaci-badon, California

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The location is a place on a map with no particular assertion of notability. Tyrenon (talk) 20:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Named settlements are considered worthy of inclusion regardless of size. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:46, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:02, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - The village really did exist. An historical village of an ethnic group that almost went extinct is an assertion of notability.  Just being a village would be so too. --Oakshade (talk) 00:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep — we have proof of its existence, and widespread consensus is that all actual communities are notable, even former ones. Nyttend (talk) 02:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as per everyone but nominator. Edward321 (talk) 12:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.