Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kadhal Pisase


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:26, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Kadhal Pisase

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unknown film. Sources don't give much information about the film. DragoMynaa (talk) 19:12, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 19:12, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 19:12, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep as has reviews in reliable sources such as The Times of India, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:46, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * delete the film fails general notability criteria as it lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. It also fails all the criteria outlined in notability guidelines for films. Not just that, it also fails criteria for other evidence of notability. Talking about the review by times of india mentioned in the comment above, criteria states "The film [can be notable if it is] widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics." The film was neither widely distributed, nor reviewed by two "nationally known critics". Times of India is well known for PR, paid news/reviews, especially regarding entertainment sector. Getting review, or cover coverage in TOI is not sign of notability at all. As the film fails all other criteria, its just another movie that exists. —usernamekiran(talk) 07:00, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
 * As discussed at WP:NFILM nationally known critics means critics who write for national publications as they are obviously nationally known, the Times of India is a national newspaper whether you like it or not and the fact that it was a scathing review that gave the film 1 out of 5 stars shows it was an independent review, imv Atlantic306 (talk)
 * still, that makes only one review. Not two. —usernamekiran(talk) 15:43, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Question: Do the reviews have to be in English? It's possible there are sources in Hindi, for example. Toughpigs (talk) 19:49, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * as long as they are independent, well reputed, and/or nationally known, language doesnt matter. I did a thorough search, I couldnt find anything usable. —usernamekiran(talk) 19:55, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 22:27, 6 January 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep The two sources are all I could also find, too. Those are "multiple" sources... Missvain (talk) 05:31, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 06:49, 14 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.