Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaella Carr


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 12:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Kaella Carr

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:BLP of a mid-market local television journalist, not properly referenced as passing our inclusion standards for journalists. As always, a local TV news reporter is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because her existence is technically verified by a staff profile on the self-published website of her own employer -- the notability test is the reception of third-party coverage indicating that the significance of her work has been externally validated by sources that don't sign her paycheque, such as evidence that she has won a Gemini or Canadian Screen Award for best television journalist, and/or outside analysis of the importance of her work in the Review of Journalism. But as usual for bad articles about television journalists, this is essentially written like somebody tried to paraphrase her staff profile, is referenced solely to said staff profile, and says absolutely nothing about her that would actually constitute a notability claim. Wikipedia is WP:NOTLINKEDIN, and the baseline for inclusion here requires much more than just "Kaella Carr exists as a person who has a job". Bearcat (talk) 19:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alberta-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete we lack the level of sources to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Meets neither WP:GNG nor WP:JOURNALIST. I can't find any reliable sources referring to this person. Samsmachado (talk) 16:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass WP:GNG. The article also lacks notabile and reliable sources.Juggyevil (talk) 14:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:JOURNALIST. Article lacks reliable sources to establish notability.  Ts12rAc talk to me 10:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.