Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaffeine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Kaffeine

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable software product. No claim to notability, no third-party references given to establish notability. Mikeblas (talk) 15:50, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ORG smooth0707 (talk) 17:13, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Huh? This is piece of software, not a company... VG &#x260E; 20:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 19:46, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a well-known application, and most of the other large Wikipedias have articles about it. See bg:Kaffeine, ca:Kaffeine, cs:Kaffeine, de:Kaffeine, es:Kaffeine, fr:Kaffeine, it:Kaffeine, nl:Kaffeine, ja:Kaffeine, pl:Kaffeine, pt:Kaffeine, ru:Kaffeine, sk:Kaffeine, sv:Kaffeine, tr:Kaffeine, uk:Kaffeine. I am going to propose that we ignore all rules and keep this article because well-known software ought to be inherently notable. I added a reference:  calls Kaffeine and some similar applications "very good players", but doesn't say very much about them. --Eastmain (talk) 19:46, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Loads of reliable sources found by Google Books and Google News searches. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. The reviews are in very marginal sources. The plethora of links that google finds do not discriminate between the media player and the other products and companies called Kaffeine... . Keep; it is mentioned in passing in half a dozen books on Linux distros and some books on multimedia. VG &#x260E; 20:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, per above. SF007 (talk) 00:19, 21 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.