Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai-man Kwan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Kai-man Kwan

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The sources in the article are all from the organization he works for, and there is a lack of in-depth third-party sources. 日期20220626 (talk) 22:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 日期20220626 (talk) 22:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Christianity,  and Hong Kong. Shellwood (talk) 00:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. The nomination statement is faulty in several ways: it is about sources in the article, but WP:GNG-based notability is about sources that can be found elsewhere, not just the ones that have already been used, and WP:PROF-based notability is largely not about independence of sources. That said, we don't seem to have evidence of WP:PROF: ignoring the business theorist with the same name, he isn't well cited enough for #C1, and his administrative position is not high enough for #C6. Not counting his dissertation, he appears to have one book, The Rainbow of Experiences, and I only found one review of it,, not enough for WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If I could find another good source I wouldn't make a request to delete the article. 日期20220626 (talk) 00:09, 29 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.