Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai Frobel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. SNOW close Tone 13:28, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Kai Frobel

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Was prodded for notability, but it also describes the Green Belt Europe, which seems notable to me. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:49, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you want this article to be  deleted or not? You give no reason to have this article deleted. Ikip (talk) 06:15, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  04:56, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - I'd say he is notable enough per  and many other German sources. The article needs to be rewritten though... -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa  Chord 2  05:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep per the sky tv reference already in the article. 22 google news entries. Author of at least two books. and the central figure in a BBC documentary. Ikip (talk) 06:14, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per asserted and found notability. Was this brought to AfD only to seek improvement? Even the nom agrees he seems notable. Per WP:AFTER - In English:, , , , , and in German: , , , , , , , , et al.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep No reason for deletion is provided - the nominator created the article and seems content with it. Colonel Warden (talk) 09:28, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Bringing an article to AFD after contesting a PROD is not uncommon. It is to make sure consensus exists to keep it to counter further deletion nominations on the same grounds whatever those were. - Mgm|(talk) 11:46, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable coverage in third party media is clearly referenced.  D r e a m Focus  11:55, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.