Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai Røberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Awbfiend (talk) 20:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Kai Røberg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not seem to be notable. The article has had only a handful of substantive edits in 13 years. In that time the team has even been relegated to 3. divisjon (which is actually only the fourth highest division in Norway). It is not clear that the subject still plays the sport or is with the team specified. The information in the article is totally inconsistent with what few online sources are available, such as this page. Awbfiend (talk) 01:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:53, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:53, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:05, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep, 48 appearances in a pro league. But should be updated, infobox added etc. Geschichte (talk) 14:32, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 16:58, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - multiple professional appearances means he meets WP:NFOOTBALL by some way. Needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 17:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - I don't understand this nomination - article is clear that they spent 5 years in the top level of Norwegian football, easily meeting WP:NFOOTBALL. The stats are quite detailed in the Italian version. And it all matches the source that is questioned in the nomination. Nfitz (talk) 04:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * To clarify, since the nomination, Geschichte has kindly made significant changes to reflect the source and improve the article. Acknowledge that I had not compared to the Italian version. Awbfiend (talk) 10:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Then why not withdraw your nomination User:Awbfiend? I'm changing to a speedy. Nfitz (talk) 14:41, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Agree I have done so on the basis that Geschichte has kindly rewritten the article and resolved the issues. Awbfiend (talk) 20:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.