Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai Simonsen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 19:57, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Kai Simonsen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is completely unsourced and does not appear to demonstrate notability. I've searched for sources, but all I can find is social media, bloggy things and sources that effectively just say what his job is and who he works for. I can't find any in-depth material that is actually about him. Mr Potto (talk) 12:06, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: lots of very brief mentions due to the nature of his job but no depth of coverage. Fails WP:BIO Vrac (talk) 14:47, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk  17:46, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete no claim to notability in the article. Only ref in the article is a resume at one of his employers' website. No coverage to pass WP:GNG, no significance to pass WP:JOURNALIST. Kraxler (talk) 17:36, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.