Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaibin Huang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mz7 (talk) 03:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Kaibin Huang

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to meet criteria for inclusion at Notability (academics) at this time. Citobun (talk) 12:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:12, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:12, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep It's tempting to be skeptical of an early-career assistant professor, but I think an h-index of 29 is probably indicative of notability for this field. He has about ten papers cited >100 times, and he's listed as the first author for most of those. EricEnfermero (Talk) 01:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment The article's creator is under investigation for sockpuppetry at Sockpuppet investigations/MarcellusDWallace. Timmyshin (talk) 09:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Which appears to have concluded that this is a class project of some kind, rather than sockpuppetry. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep per Eric. Having two awards from IEEE also makes him quite notable in his field. HKU follows an English university system (as opposed to American) so professorships in themselves have a significant degree of importance attached to them. Deryck C. 17:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Ten papers with over 100 citations each in Google scholar is enough for WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Eppstein DarjeelingTea (talk) 10:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes WP:GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.