Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaimakchalan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy close with no other action per the arbcom case, which greatly limits the actions we can take on these duplicate articles. After that case closes this one can and should be reopened. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:38, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Kaimakchalan

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The page currently at Kaimakchalan is clearly repeated at: Kajmakčalan, the latter which uses correct tranliteration. The page is clearly a double and I propose either the deletion of one of them or the merger of both. PMK1 (talk) 00:37, 21 April 2009 (UTC) PMK1 (talk) 00:37, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Kajmakčalan. Redirects are primarily meant precisely for that purpose. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 00:47, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. JJL (talk) 01:22, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I suggest you speedy close the discussion yourself and redirect appropriately.  Graymornings (talk) 01:37, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment; That would be the normal thing to do in a typical circumstance. However, a recent motion passed here, strictly states that: No Macedonia-related article, broadly defined, shall be moved/renamed until after the "Macedonia 2" case closes. If it does occur, any uninvolved administrator can expeditiously revert it. After the case closes, Macedonia-related moves/renames can occur as prescribed in the final decision.
 * I am not sure whether or not this affects this AFD case directly however the motion does not state that the article cannot be deleted. It would be an irregular happening, however a way to by-pass the ruling by the ARBCOM Comitee through this certain "loop-hole". PMK1 (talk) 03:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


 * RedirectCan we WP:BOLD/WP:SNOW this? &eta;oian   &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  02:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.