Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kainat Soomro (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Kainat Soomro
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:VICTIM. The article is probably harming the subject because it stands in the way of her moving on in life, and also makes it difficult for the rapists to move on. The girl is probably at a marriageable age, or recently married, and this article here could be particularly problematic now. The rapists being unable to move on means this article creates greater risk of harm for the girl. Some recent blankings of the article may be due to the reasons described, and these blankings were what prompted me to contemplate the reasons for blankings, and propose this article for deletion. The girl may not be able to make her case here because she may not know the process, or may not have proper internet access, or whatever. So, it is not good to expect them to make their case for us to see their problem with this article. We should see their problems on our own and decide accordingly. OrangesRyellow (talk) 08:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (utter)  @ 21:04, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. The suggested reasons for deletion are speculative, and there's been continuing coverage. Here are articles from March 2014, October 2014 , and November 2014  about the current status of her case, and her continuing advocacy, despite her bad health. This December she went to Oslo for Malala Yousufzai's Nobel Prize ceremony, at Malala's invitation.  --Arxiloxos (talk) 05:40, 30 December 2014 (UTC)


 * I think my concerns have been shown to be unfounded, particularly through the last two links. I would like to withdraw the AFD, but would support deletion if the subject wants this article deleted any time in future. Thanks.OrangesRyellow (talk) 07:44, 30 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. per the recent media coverage and rationale given above by Arxiloxos. Fai  zan  08:43, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.