Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaitou Apricot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Kaitou Apricot

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced after a decade and there are no sources in sight. I asked at the visual novels project and there isn't enough to constitute significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) A video game reliable sources custom Google search came up dry too. I don't see any particularly useful redirects. czar 00:04, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  czar  00:04, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as nothing here suggests a better notable article for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:30, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable video game failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. Lots of directory entries, no substantial content. I'm not proficient with Japanese sources, so my search did not include such and there's no jp: version to check sources. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 23:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not seeing any in-depth third party sourcing or coverage to demonstrate notability. --DAJF (talk) 23:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.