Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaival Gyan Mandir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:33, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Kaival Gyan Mandir

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Non-notable religious group &mdash; goethean &#2384; 01:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: I've reread the article several times and also browsed to the external link at the bottom of the article. Is "Kaival Gyan Mandir" a sect, a Hindu congregation or a person? Couldn't this be speedy deleted as A1 since it provides no context as to what exactly the subject of the article is? Victorian Mutant (Talk) 12:18, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * My impression is that this mandir is a particular "congregation" in the Chicago area, which is part of a larger Hindu sect which is referred to in this article as 'Sat Kaival Gyan Panth'. That sect may be notable in India (using Hindi- or Gujurati-language sources), but I couldn't find any English-language sources for its notability. &mdash; goethean &#2384; 15:43, 27 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. I support a speedy delete as well. Went through their website and still can't figure it out. My best guess is that Kaival Gyan possibly references a holy entity, another reincarnation of a universal god, or a belief system, while "Mandir" may possibly differentiate one local society from others within their belief system. But then again, I could be wrong. ;) Cindamuse (talk) 14:39, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Based on additional content provided in the article, recommend speedy delete (G11). Content clearly promotional in nature. Cindamuse (talk) 17:55, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Now that gothean has clarified the subject (and the author has expanded the article), its purpose is now clear... it's an advertisement! Victorian Mutant (Talk) 16:57, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable and no sources to support. Even the sampradaya is not notable. Wikid as&#169; 19:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete There are no reliable sources to establish notability. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  11:00, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Reads like an advertisement and is non-notable. Rabbabodrool (talk) 15:46, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.