Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaiya Lynn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. Michig (talk) 08:47, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Kaiya Lynn

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:ENT, and the GNG. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits, just PR/presskit pieces and a tiny number of castlists. No reliably sourced biographical information, just fansites and retailer promo pages. By repeated AFD and DRV consensus, an Urban X award nomination does not count toward PORNBIO requirements or otherwise demonstrate notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:10, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Point me to the consensus that says this, please.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 19:31, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment – Here are a few prior discussions indicating a consensus to that effect: 1 – clearest explanation, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. JFHJr (㊟) 20:01, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * But Urban X isn't the only nomination she has; there's also a F.A.M.E. nomination. That isn't accepted either?  Erpert  Who is this guy? 20:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * In your estimation, does that approach (WP:PORNBIO) "Has received nominations for well-known award s in multiple years " or some other notability standard? It doesn't in mine. JFHJr (㊟) 20:13, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 2006 and 2010 aren't multiple years?  Erpert  Who is this guy? 02:00, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete – Per rationale and consensus above regarding WP:PORNBIO and Urban X. Otherwise, this subject doesn't pass WP:BASIC requirements. JFHJr (㊟) 20:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Doesn't pass PORNBIO. FAME nomination is not a final round nomination (finalist). Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:19, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Before everyone decides that this article I created should be deleted because the Urban X and F.A.M.E. nominations apparently don't count as valid nominations, you should all look at this. To say there's no consensus there would be an understatement, and since people can't decide there which awards are considered notable, it doesn't seem right to say the nominations I listed are without merit.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 02:11, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * As JFHJr pointed out, the consensus regarding the Urban X/Urban Spice Awards has been establish by multiple prior community discussions. As Morbidthoughts pointed out, early-round nominations for the FAME Awards don't satisfy PORNBIO requirements, and PORNBIO says so quite clearly in footnote 11: "For awards with multiple rounds of nominations such as the Fans of Adult Media and Entertainment Award, only final round nominations are considered." Morbidthoughts' comment is right on target (I'd missed that in reviewing the article) and is alone sufficient to show the subject fails the relevant criterion in PORNBIO. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:34, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * It's interesting that you're tagging onto my comment as though you evaluated my point, but instead you're just reinstating your point without even mentioning the discussion I just pointed out (although I'm not really surprised).  Erpert  Who is this guy? 03:44, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Morbidthoughts. Fails PORNBIO. Also fails GNG without non-trivial coverage by reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per all, really. And what's with the sourcing--are we really adding details about who someone takes it up the butt with based on the fansite? Drmies (talk) 04:04, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Morbidthoughts. Epbr123 (talk) 20:51, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.