Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaizenetics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Shereth 19:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Kaizenetics

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is about a neologism apparently first coined in 2006. I have not been able to find any reliable sources which could be used to verify the content of the article (or even show that the article isn't a hoax) and I doubt that there are any to be found. Guest9999 (talk) 09:13, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Just to expand a Google search of Kaisenetics gives 39 results all of which appear to be about expired domain names. A Google search of "Dennis Cummins" Kaizen gives one result - the Wikipedia article in question. A search of Kaizen gives millions of hits and I would expect that a notable system relating to it would have more of an internet presence. Guest9999 (talk) 09:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

sadf —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.15.20.168 (talk) 13:33, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Creation by user:Totalhealthtraining suggests spam even though they created no link. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 09:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Virek (talk) 11:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete have verified nom's claims and agree with them. Atyndall93 | talk 12:20, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: As per nom. Proxy User (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nomination. A rosily and vaguely described self-improvement plan. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:59, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No Google Books hits either. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:09, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 18:56, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete spammy spam promising to unlock the power within. I'll unlock my delete vote within. JuJube (talk) 06:07, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Good call by the nom. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.