Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaj Andersen (footballer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neither Govvy nor Das osmnezz advances a policy-based reason for keeping. Guerillero Parlez Moi 19:58, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Kaj Andersen (footballer)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. Mass-created stub by a now-banned user. A WP:BEFORE search only brings the usual database results.  Billets Mauves €500 18:58, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Denmark.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:44, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:27, 21 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment I wouldn't be so quick to judge this one. Part of how he earned his international call-ups is because he was in the squad when Boldklubben 1913 won the Danish Cup for the only time, played in European competition for the club. You would have to look for the more local sources which generally seem to be tough as most people don't want to look for them. And frankly, Lugnuts being banned is simply poor wikipedia politics. He was a good editor and will be missed in my opinion and that shouldn't be the case which I feel is a perfectly valid stub created under the old rules. Govvy (talk) 20:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:51, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per Govvy. I look at the other Sports WikiProjects (or any WikiProject) and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. By the time I finish writing this, another 30 will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 15:39, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
 * None of that is relevant. The challenge is that the subject does not meet WP:GNG. That is countered by producing mulitiple independent, reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:06, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, most of Das osmnezz's comment seems to be copy-pasted into various AfDs, for example . Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of actually meeting WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC so no evidence of requiring a separate article for this person Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.