Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaj Nielsen (footballer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Denmark international footballers (1–24 caps). Liz Read! Talk! 06:33, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Kaj Nielsen (footballer)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Violates the general criteria of WP:NOTDATABASE due to being an article that replicates a database entry. In addition, it fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT.

Previously nominated in a group nomination which was closed as no consensus on procedural grounds. BilledMammal (talk) 05:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 05:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Denmark.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:49, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:29, 18 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep Article hasn't scratched the surface, bias nomination in my view and this is a perfectly valid stub for an international footballer who played top flight football in Denmark for over six years. A true WP:BEFORE hasn't been done, as this is about Offline sources. Govvy (talk) 08:47, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If you have any examples of WP:SIGCOV, I would be willing to reconsider my delete vote below. Cbl62 (talk) 17:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet notability guidelines Proton Dental (talk) 02:16, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Denmark international footballers (1–24 caps), if no-one finds enough SIGCOV to keep. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:00, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Struway2 if nothing else can found on him, per WP:ATD, WP:PRESERVE, WP:R and WP:CHEAP.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 09:17, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Giant Snowman. Cbl62 (talk) 17:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of being notable.   scope_creep Talk  10:11, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete there are no GNG meeting sources, and no one has argued that there are any. This is a true sign of systemic bias, when people nominate articles on Danish people with no good sources, people argue that we should keep them because of no good reasons, but when people argue equally badly sourced articles on Samoan, Tongan, Tuvaluan or Virgin Islander people the articles get deleted based on an actual evaluation of sources. Sources are key, sources that meet GNG, and they are lacking here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.