Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kakao bank


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Kakao bank

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

2/3 promotional, 1/3 original research, and no clear indication of notability. I get the impression almost all the refs are in-house productions (can't be sure because I don't read Korean, verification would be welcome). -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 07:57, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 08:00, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Non notable and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic. &mdash; cnzx  00:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:18, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 28 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- corporate 'cruft on a nn business. WP:TNT eligible. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.