Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kal Karman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:11, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Kal Karman

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:BIO, but most importantly we've got an OTRS request at 2010061210025653 to have this unreferenced, dangerously underwatched article removed. I'd appreciate it if the community would kowtow to Mr Karman's concerns. Ironholds (talk) 03:54, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. At WP:NOT the sub point "Who's who" is pertinent. Kal Karman is just a director of commercial messages.  As a sub topic under commercial messages, those involved in their production do not rate an article.  The article on Television advertisement does not even mention the directors producers and writers of commercial messages.  It is an area that Wikipedia should not be in. (kowtowing) --Fartherred (talk) 00:07, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I have to point out some flaws in your argument here. Firstly, articles can be included if they're not under Who's Who. Secondly, the fact that an article doesn't mention a profession doesn't make that profession non-notable, and third, I'm asking us to kowtow and delete it per the subject's wishes. Ironholds (talk) 09:06, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No matter his field of work, Kal Karman has coverage (mostly non-English) from 2003 through 2009... and per WP:GNG might merit inclusion if the article were to be cleaned-up, expanded, and properly sourced. However, and out of respect to the subject's request at OTRS, a delete is fine with me.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:55, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.