Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalachi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No evidence of the existence of this currency has been provided. No prejudice against recreation if WP:V requirements can be met. Sjakkalle (Check!)  10:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Kalachi

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Verifiability concern. I can't find any evidence of this currency. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:50, 2 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 05:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  -- —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:15, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  -- —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:16, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge into an appropriate article, such as History of Sindh; also transwikify to dictionary. In both cases, this is on the assumption that this article is verifiable and not a HOAX.  Note, since this is an Urdu word, transliteration into English may result in variant spellings.  Peterkingiron (talk) 00:12, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Currencies should always have their own articles. – EdvardMunch (talk) 05:40, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * If you take a look at the reason for this deletion nomination, you'll see that I can't find any evidence that this currency existed. —Largo Plazo (talk) 05:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:V. See? . What if I made up a currency of Ancient Mesopotamia, the "kipkol"? It would have to be deleted, because WP:V is a policy. Abductive  (reasoning) 05:50, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.