Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaleidica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 11:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Kaleidica

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article does not assert the notability of its subject, and appears to exist only for the sake of promoting Kaleidica, a commercial software package. Sławomir Biały (talk) 18:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete – Agree with nominator, a strictly promotional piece. No information available on either the product or the company that developed the software Fishrock Studios on Google News where I would expect at least a PR News release.  In this light, no pun intended, delete is the only choice.  Thanks ShoesssS Talk 20:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yeah, this feels like advertisement, and it feels non-notable.  At the very least, a good bit of the article would need to be taken out for it to cease being an ad, and even then I'd need to see a review or two of it from a decently mainstream or industry publication to be convinced of notability.Tyrenon (talk) 05:21, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:47, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.