Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kali Sandbrook


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the nomination was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Kali Sandbrook
A google search indicates 3 unique hits in regards to this name, it looks to me like this is a vanity add and not a notable person. --ImmortalGoddezz 14:34, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Sorry. you're 'just another'. --DarkAudit 03:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC) - This one's a bit personal though? And also, I never claimed that attending protests was a "claim to fame." I don't mind people saying that they article isn't encyclopedic, but there's no need to get personal. Immortal Godezz, was just teasing you about your name, hence the "haha." Thanks for the message. (Kali-bo-bali 08:40, 6 July 2006 (UTC))
 * Speedy Delete patently non-notable, could be db-bio'd --IslaySolomon 15:22, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * p>There are many activists, young and old, from various backgrounds, countries and with various beliefs listed on wikipedia. Why not this one also? User: Vegano 15:43, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I thought that this was an interesting history from a politically involved person, and is important to anyone researching such issues as animal rights, esp in New Zeland. It would seem inappropriate to delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.95.153.4 (talk • contribs) 2006-07-05 16:03:21
 * The article cites no sources at all, and provides no evidence that this person satisfies any of the WP:BIO criteria. Delete. Uncle G 16:08, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Several external hyperlinks have been added to the article. These do not constitute sources, for the simple reason that the articles linked to make no mention whatever of the person who is the subject of this article.  The article remains completely unverifiable. Uncle G 11:49, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm guessing Kali wrote the article?  In any event, very non-notable. — Tapir Terrific 16:45, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I am interested in any activists or people who are working for social change or for something other than there own personal gain, be it animal rights, anti-war, environmentalism or any other cause. This is not a broad article, no, but I find it far more interesting than the Immortal Goddess and her fraternity.  Just personal opinion of a regular wikipedia visitor. User: ladyluck7 20:02 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO (and apparently WP:VAIN). No indication of any notability, no matter who may be "interested in" the topic on which this person is an activist.  WP:NOT a soapbox.  There's no assertion in the article that this person has done anything encyclopedic even if it could be verified; attending protests and moving in with another activist aren't noteworthy.  Barno 20:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, well I've just found this article about myself. No I didn't write it, I'm sure no one is that self-interested!  A friend of mine wrote this.  Yeah, ok, my life's not of any great "notability" (yet), but I don't appreciate the not so nice comments here.  People need to lighten up.  I don't mind if this is deleted, it was a bit of a laugh, I'm not really fussed.  But I do find it amazing how people spend so much time on this site, picking at and commenting on other articles.  If you know the codes and criteria of a site I think that's a bit sad, yeah it's a handy site, but living your life in front of a computer is never a good thing! (Kali-bo-bali 21:13, 5 July 2006 (UTC))
 * I find your comment a little hypocritical, since you call out people for not being nice yet you then try to slam them for spending too much time on the computer, and call them sad. --ColourBurst 01:26, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, I'm sorry but I have to say! Who's talking about a "vanity add," vanity?  You named yourself "Immortal Goddess" for cryin out loud!!  Does anyone else find that just a tad hypocritical?  haha! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kali-bo-bali (talk • contribs)
 * Speedy delete as ; attending several anti-fur demonstrations and being a vegan is hardly a claim to fame. Kali, people are not personally attacking you - they simply disagree with your article being included into Wikipedia under the current editorial and inclusion guidelines. RidG Talk/Contributions 23:11, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, WP:BIO and WP:VAIN (even if not by the subject herself, but a friend). seems applicable. (And for the record, I haven't seen any "not-so-nice comments" about the subject, just judgment passed on the article itself.) HumbleGod 01:01, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per A7. Soliciting spare change on the other side of the world is not encyclopedic value on this side. Sorry. you're 'just another'. --DarkAudit 03:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Valid points made. Fair enough.  I didn't mean to sound like I was "slamming" anybody, just suggesting more constructive uses of ones time.  To each their own.  The article was only a joke in the first place so no worries.
 * Speedy Delete, CSD A7. Article fails to show or assert verified notability to the levels outlined by WP:BIO. -- blue 520  12:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's not a speedy as there are some claims of notability, but clearly fails WP:BIO. Stifle (talk) 18:16, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.