Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaligoanj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Procedural keep - redirect. The Bushranger One ping only 09:37, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Kaligoanj

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is an implausible spell error of Kaliganj. Now redirects to Kaliganj but we do not need this redirect, rather delete Kaligoanj which is an implausible misspell. »  nafSadh did say 17:18, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: as "Kaligoanj" is currently in the text of Kaliganj it appears to be a very plausible mis-spelling. Pam  D  18:34, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment well, it did include that spelling, but after reviewing Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Bangladesh I have corrected the spelling in the article to match the title of the article, as advised in that discussion. Redirects from both/all variant titles are needed. I do not understand the rationale for this AfD nomination. Pam  D  23:28, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * This should be at RfD, not at AfD: Kaligoanj is a redirect. I don't know what the procedure is for moving discussion to the right place. Pam  D  23:35, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment: The redirect, as well as the page where it redirects to, are both redundant. The page for Kaliganj Upazila, Gazipur already exists. All of these new pages should redirect to the existing article. --Ragib (talk) 17:44, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks: I've WP:BOLDly turned Kaliganj into a redirect to the existing article, and the resulting double redirects will be fixed a bot. Pam  D  17:53, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.