Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kallan Holley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Kallan Holley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable, fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE JMHamo (talk) 18:16, 31 March 2016 (UTC)


 * KEEP - Notable, has had lead roles in tv shows like PAW Patrol. http://www.moviefone.com/tv/paw-patrol/286599/credits/, the upcoming Angry Birds film http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1985949/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_1 . And many more. Thursby16 (talk) 18:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note Thursby16 is the original writer of and primary contributor to the article in question. crh23 (talk) 19:39, 31 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep She has a main role in Paw Patrol, which is in its third season. She will also be in The Angry Birds Movie, though I'm not sure how big her role is. She has also won a young artist award, and was nominated for another. Finally, despite the articles short existence, it has already been viewed 137 times. JDDJS (talk) 00:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:53, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:53, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete perhaps and certainly Redirect' to Paw Patrol as this is still frankly questionable and the best two works are listed, too soon at best. I'm also no longer convinced by the Young Artist Awards to save articles. SwisterTwister   talk  04:53, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  20:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:59, 14 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting for the last time so the debate (hopefully) receives some more attention. Omni Flames  let's talk about it  00:03, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Omni Flames   let's talk about it  00:03, 24 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Wikipedia is not a public relations platform on which people in any field of endeavour are entitled to have articles just because they exist — it takes reliable source coverage about her in media to earn her an article. If you have to rely on cast lists in cast-list directories like Moviefone or IMDb as your only "sources", however, then you have not gotten her over the bar — and no source present here is anything more than an IMDb-like cast-list directory. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when her sourceability gets a lot better than this. Bearcat (talk) 23:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article fails to meet WP:GNG or WP:ACTOR. The only sources that can be found are very routine things, nothing that shows notability in any way. When trying to scrape together sources for an article, if the best we can find is something like this, it's a good hint that it's not quite time to make such an article. - Aoidh (talk) 19:53, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Minimal career (so far) and there appears to be zero significant coverage in reliable sources. --Michig (talk) 07:23, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  20:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. not noteworthy at this time. Kierzek (talk) 23:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Unfortunately as she hasn't done very much yet (she is very young of course) there are very few sources that can be used to prove notability. She may well become very famous and we may see her name again in the future. ツStacey (talk) 17:01, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * "Keep' Adequate indicia of notability. I'm noticing a lot of bias against children's programming lately; these programs are themselves of adequate notability and while they are not as extensively covered in the mainstream press as "adult" films, one needs to look to the standard of the world of children's programming and assess within that level.  Not everyone has to be Hannah Montana to meet GNG.   Montanabw (talk)  21:56, 4 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.