Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kallarakal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-26 13:35Z 

Kallarakal

 * — (View AfD)

Contested prod. Prod reason was "WP:NOT for genealogy, and not for unverified original research either (historical evidence that proves the existence of Saint Thomas and that he was in India? I doubt it..." 21 distinct Google hits for Kallarakal plus Saint Thomas minus Wikipedia. Everything that needs to be said is in the Saint Thomas Christians article. Fram 13:04, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 13:12, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - nonsense. Moreschi Deletion! 13:22, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. AFD discussion has prompted the creator to rant on the article's talk page, employing a great many exclamation marks, including the observation that "The history of Christianity should be rewritten!!!!!!!!!!!"  Erm, no thanks.  Serpent&#39;s Choice 13:27, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Unencyclopaedic drivel. --Folantin 13:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.   -- Mereda 13:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete While there is legitimacy to the claims that Thomas the Apostle founded the Christian church in India, an article devoted to a family of early converts lacking in formatting & citation surpasses the threshold of non-notability. Caknuck 20:35, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Caknuck. Big  top  23:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. utcursch | talk 11:44, 25 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.