Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalphite Queen

Kalphite Queen
Withdrawn - I'll just add a mergeto template. If it's removed, expect this AFD to reappear. Halo 10:34, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Also King Black Dragon, Chaos Elemental, Dagannoth

* All are non-notable RuneScape monsters, with indication of notability (individual characters from a relatively popular game - contrast this with the recently deleted individual CounterStrike Maps).
 * Unreferenced (WP:OR) Runecruft. Needs to be merged with RuneScape monsters in order to cut down on the excessive amount of RuneScape articles.
 * Should be completely covered RuneScape monsters article, which I debate it's relevance anyway, but I thought these are the most obvious candidates for removal.
 * Many of the articles head into GameGuide territory (as per WP:NOT), Wikipedia is not a Game Guide
 * From Kalphite Queen - The Queen resides at the very end of the cavern, past several chambers full of Kalphite Workers, Kalphite Soldiers, and Kalphite Guardians. Beyond these creatures is another hole that must be climbed down via rope. In this last chamber, along with the Kalphite Queen, there are several of the smaller Kalphite beings, which pester players attempting to kill the Kalphite Queen, but these are generally ignored.
 * From Dagannoth - As part of the Horror from the Deep quest, players must visit the basement of a lighthouse, where they have to face a level 100 dagannoth.
 * From Chaos Elemental - The Chaos Elemental is located west of the Rogues' Castle, next to the scorpion pit, in the Level 50 through 52 wilderness, an area available only to RuneScape players who pay a monthly fee (P2P).

These have been grouped together since these all cover /very/ similar subjects (individual monsters in the game), as per suggestions on the no consensus close of Articles for deletion/RuneScape armour (2nd nomination). Another AFD request has been created involving all the articles as per the note on Articles for deletion/King Black Dragon, note that King Black Dragon never was merged. -Halo 21:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment: Are you serious, Halo? The previous AfD for these articles closed yesterday. You haven't even given enough time for us to do anything with these articles. You may notice from yesterday's discussion that major contributors of the RuneScape series were willing to do this, but you haven't even given us a day to do so. If you want these pages merged, you should have put a   on these pages. Had you done that, the merge could have occured quickly and without struggle. But you didn't. So now we have to wait a week until the discussion is closed. These AfD's aren't helping, Halo. Hyenaste (tell) 21:42, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * By the way, that King Black Dragon could have been merged by you without complaint. Hyenaste (tell) 21:42, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh I forgot to vote. I agree, merge. Hyenaste (tell) 21:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into RuneScape monsters sort-of per nom. Weren't they in that article once anyway? However, what is wrong with the simple addition of a tag, as Hyenaste suggests? It would be much quicker. Oh, and as a side note, 5 million active players (compared to World of Warcraft's six million, see the articles) doesn't much look like "relatively unpopular" to me. :-P CaptainVindaloo t c e 02:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Wikipedia is not a large collection of unsuccessful AFD nominations of RuneScape articles. See Articles for deletion/RuneScape armour, Articles for deletion/RuneScape armour (2nd nomination), Articles for deletion/King Black Dragon, Articles for deletion/Construction (RuneScape), Articles for deletion/RuneScape skills, Articles for deletion/RuneScape Community, Articles for deletion/Runecrafting, Articles for deletion/RuneScape skills, and Articles for deletion/RuneScape gods.  Enough is enough! John254 04:50, 25 July 2006 (UTC)